MEDSPAGUIDE

The business, science and rules shaping medical aesthetics.

Editorial Standards

How MedspaGuide sources, qualifies and reviews US medical-aesthetics analysis.

Source policy

Primary sources first

Every regulatory, legal and medical claim in our articles is linked to a primary official source: a federal agency, a state board or authority, or published legislation. We do not rely on secondary summaries when the original is accessible.

Secondary sources (industry reports, academic papers, reputable news) may be referenced for context, but no material claim depends on them alone.

Jurisdiction

State claims stay state-specific

The US medical-aesthetics market is regulated state by state. We do not extrapolate one state's rules across the country. When an article uses California, Texas or Florida as examples, that is all they are — examples. They are not templates for other states.

Independence

No paid verdicts

MedspaGuide does not accept payment for editorial coverage, rankings, reviews or safety determinations. Any future commercial service (directory listing, sponsorship, advertising) will be structurally separated from editorial content and clearly labelled.

No clinic has paid or will pay for inclusion in our analysis. No clinic can buy a favourable conclusion.

Limitations

What we do not do

Corrections

Transparent corrections

If an error is discovered, we correct the record and note the change with the date and nature of the correction. Material corrections remain visible in the article.

To report an error, contact the MedspaGuide Editorial Desk.

Disclaimer

All content on MedspaGuide is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute medical, legal, regulatory or business advice. Laws, rules and regulations vary by jurisdiction and may change. Readers should consult qualified professionals for their specific situation.